First and foremost, I’m a data guy. Show me the data that
reinforces your point on a topic if applicable and I'll listen. If its in a peer reviewed paper or presentation, all the better. No hearsay.
No opinions that poise as factual information. No passive aggressive comment rants. I like hardcore data. The problem is that science and data are
scary topics for most people even the most science savvy individual. The mere word “data” has cold, dark connotations. Data is antiseptic. That’s why people have a tough time relating
to it. This is why politicians steer clear of spouting esoteric numbers. So they attach an emotional component to it--a clever narrative--to attract voters. It works. Its basic human nature. But it can grossly diminish the baseline
facts of any issue. Human nature allows us to forge relationships with other people. It’s the essence of the human
experience. It defines who we are. Yet it can blur our vision when we perform data driven analysis of any kind. This is where Behavioral Meteorology comes into the
picture.
When I say "Behavioral Meteorology", people think that this
only refers to how the changing weather conditions alter our moods and body. While this undoubtedly occurs (ask my
surgically repaired shoulder before a snow storm), my definition of Behavioral Meteorology is the study of how we perceive weather, weather forecasts and climate through our own cognitive biases and preconceived ideas. The aim of my blog is simple: Present the weather and the data in a
local context with some historical perspective. When applicable, show
how our preconceived notions of the weather affect our objectivity. I revisit these ideas either directly or indirectly in posts by answering some of these questions below using a myriad of charts, graphs and easy-to-understand images.
1) How do we “perceive” the actual weather conditions, weather
forecasts and past weather events?
2) To what degree has the proliferation of weather
information over the internet and most recently smart
phones skewed our view on the accuracy
of weather forecasts?
3)
Has this flood of instantaneous weather information influenced
the public’s view on current weather events and their place in weather
history?
4) Do people put more credence in weather folklore than in weather science?
4) Do people put more credence in weather folklore than in weather science?
5)
What are the specific psychological drivers of our weather/science perceptions? More generally--a topic for other more qualified people to answer--how do these "drivers" lead us astray on more pressing global and
domestic issues outside science?
As a reader, I hope that you take a step back and do the same.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.