Tuesday, May 13, 2014

Northern Ohio Severe Weather Recap. ONE TORNADO CONFIRMED




A pretty big weather day yesterday across northern Ohio. Many severe storms with heavy rainfall (2-5"), 1" hail reported & tornado warnings. 


Many people have complained about our "wall-to-wall" coverage saying that nothing was happening and it wasn't worth it. "No tornadoes on the ground so what is the point of coverage like this?" a few said via Facebook and Twitter.  While its easy to lump this event in with all of the others, this round of severe storm was very different than other severe weather events we've had in the recent past in northern Ohio. Why? First, many of the severe cells had the classic hook echo characteristic indicating strong counter clockwise winds which often indicate a tornado. Thankfully, only ONE TORNADO was confirmed in Lorain County. I thought we'd end up with 4 or 5 easily.


Secondly, many cells also had strong changes in wind direction embedded within them. By using the "Velocity Scan", we can determine which cells have rotational signatures by recognizing those small scale wind direction changes. Green colors mean wind moving toward the radar. Red colors mean wind is moving away. Notice the abrupt change and the implied rotation.


For these reasons, the National Weather Service issued tornado warnings. As a public service, it is mandatory to inform the public of the tornado warnings. Given the numerous storms, we needed to break into programming to cover this event BIG TIME! 

For those of you who claim that more tornado warnings are being issued for northern Ohio, that's not the case. After doing some exhausting research compiling tornado warning history, I found that the issuance of tornado warnings at the National Weather Service office in Cleveland, Ohio (our home office) is trending lower since the early 1990s. Also, the percentage of tornado warnings that result in actual tornadoes here in northern Ohio during the same period is comparable to the national average.




=======================================================================

As we recap yesterday's severe weather, its a good idea to review what constitutes a severe thunderstorm as defined by the National Weather Service.


Most storms NEVER reach severe limits. A very small number of severe storms actually produce a tornado. That's comforting news for all of us. That said, the mere mention of the word "severe" has extreme connotations. Many people believe that the word "severe" means "tornado". Nothing could be further from the truth. Here are the tornado facts and figures that I hope set the record straight.

* 5% of storms are severe. Only 1% of storms produce tornadoes

* Tornado warnings are issued for about 75% of all tornadoes

* In 2007, the National Weather Service started to issue warnings on a more local level versus on a county basis. These "polygons" localize the threat inside a specific part of a county.

* Tornadoes occur over a wide spectrum of strengths, sizes, and lifetimes.  Of the 800–1400 tornadoes reported in the United States each year, about 86% can be characterized as weak, 13% as strong, and 1% as violent.  

* In general, weak tornadoes (86%) have lifetimes less than 10 min, widths around 100 m (yards) and paths less than 1.6 km (1 mile) in length.  National Weather Service radars can complete ONE SCAN every 4 to 6 minutes! 

* Typical tornadic wind speeds are on the order 110 mph.   

* The average “lead time” for tornado warnings was less than 5 min in the late 1980s. By the late 1990s, lead time was up to 10 minutes; 13 minutes today (2014)

* National Weather Service forecasters provided a 24-minute lead time for tornado warnings in Joplin, Missouri back in 2011, almost TWICE the national average

* According to one study in 1978, there was a 22% probability of tornado detection with a 3 minute warning lead time. By 1998, the probability had jumped to 65%! 

7 comments:

Rock Robbster said...

So is this why I saw upper level clouds moving slow and easterly, while lower level clouds were rapidly moving north westerly?

Rock Robbster said...

So is this why I saw upper level clouds moving slow and easterly, while lower level clouds were rapidly moving north westerly?

Rock Robbster said...

So is this why I saw upper level clouds moving slow and easterly, while lower level clouds were rapidly moving north westerly?

Mel F. said...

Thank you for this post, Scott. It's always cool to read about the science behind the weather we live through. I personally appreciated the coverage and program interruption, and am always concerned when there are events such as last night. I think a lot of the people who complain are native Clevelanders who have not seen a major event in recent history, so they take the risk factor for granted. Sadly, all it will take is another Xenia, after which people will then complain there aren't enough warnings.

Womthang said...

Thanks for explaining that stuff, Scott. It makes me feel safer.

Andy Donaldson said...

Scott,
The old saying goes, "haters gotta hate". Last July 10th, a line of storms was heading towards Tuscarawas County. I raced home to the Bolivar/Zoar area ahead of them and turned on Fox 8. Andre was on showing the radar data. I told my daughter to go grab flashlights just in case. The weather at the time was eerily calm outside. A minute later, the power cut out and the winds picked up like I had never seen before. We raced downstairs and rode out the storm. When it passed, we came upstairs and it didn't look like too much damage at the house. When my wife arrived home later, she told me of all the down trees in Zoar. Well, it was a tornado. If it wasn't for the "wall to wall" coverage, we might not have been ready to react in time, especially if the funnel that grazed our area had touched down. Like it did in Mineral City taking out the fire station. We were lucky. The funnel was a few hundred yards south of us and just did some wind damage, (and a new free roof!)
So keep on doing what you guys do to keep people safe. It is appreciated and can save a life.

John said...

I would like to let you know how valuable your coverage was. My daughter had just moved from here in central California to Medina a few days ago. She has no familiarity with tornados. Her husband was out of town on business, so she was there with her son, partially unpacked, and no way of getting information. When the tornado warning was given, she called us. We were able to bring your live coverage up on line and relay vital information to her via the phone.
I appreciate your coverage of this event and the thoroughness of your reporting.
J.R.